Cash or Nothing

Cash or Nothing isn't the visual eyeball massage Red Tiger slots tend to be, but in this case, the deviation appears to be on purpose. The game looks like the slot equivalent of one of those hats bank tellers or poker players wear with the green visor on them. Both of those roles would be appropriate in Cash or Nothing, fixated as it is on piling up banknotes on sort of green velvet looking tabletop. If you consider wealth to be a personality trait, Cash or Nothing has bags of character, though it does come across as largely hollow as well. In addition, it wouldn't be a surprise if the basic looks and gameplay have the same polarising effect on players as the naked money-focused theme. On a positive note, after the last few Red Tiger games we've reviewed, Cash or Nothing packs a higher max win figure than expected. Compared to contemporaries, its5,000x the betis nothing particularly special, but compared to other Red Tiger slots we'd reviewed around the same time, it is surprisingly high and makes low potential yet lush looking games like1942 Sky Warrioreven more confusing. Why did Red Tiger pad out the payout possibilities or Cash or Nothing and not the WW2 slot? It's one of those questions that doesn't immediately conjure up answers. Cash or Nothing is like a rewind to an earlier time when wealth-focused slots poured forth with seemingly reckless abandon. The simple graphics, features and classic symbols are another result of the apparently retro thinking that went into Cash or Nothing. As such, it's a game that is unlikely to suit players keen on progressive graphics, theme, or gameplay. Maybe if you're after something retro, cash-centric, a bit basic, Cash or Nothing might be a match. It didn't particularly float our boat much, feeling more like a quant sideshow or peeking at an old photo of a stranger.